Effects of constitution, atraumatic vertebral fracture and aging on bone mineral
density and soft tissue composition in women

Shinjiro Takata and Natsuo Yasui

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Tokushima School of Medicine, Tokushima, Japan

Abstract: Constitution, atraumatic vertebral fracture and aging affect bone mineral density (BMD) and soft tissue composition. The high body weight of obese women involves a high mechanical load being exerted on weight bearing bones compared with thin women, which probably contributes to their higher BMD and the lower incidence of fractures in obese women compared with thin women. Atraumatic vertebral fracture (AVF) is a typical osteoporotic fracture and its favorite site of AVF is the vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar region. The BMD of weight bearing bones is lower in patients with AVF than in patients without AVF, whereas there is no significant difference in soft tissue composition between the two. The regional and total BMD decrease with advancing age. The magnitude of the decrease in lumbar and thoracic BMD is high compared with other regional BMD, and total fat mass and total lean mass decline with age to their respective minimal level. The high rate of decrease in lumbar and thoracic BMD appears to be due to the high content of trabecular bone compared with other regional bones. J. Med. Invest. 49:18-24, 2002

Keywords:bone mineral density, osteoporosis, constitution, fracture, aging

INTRODUCTION
Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and the microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue, with a consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to fracture risk (1). In 2000, the Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research revised diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis. (2)
At present, large numbers of postmenopausal women in Japan are at high risk for osteoporosis and its associated fractures, which is an issue of clinical importance. Osteoporotic fractures are one of significant complications and an increasing health care burden in osteoporotic patients. Therefore, in the treatment of osteoporosis, prevention of fractures is undoubtedly a major goal. Smith showed that bone mineral density (BMD) accounted for approximately 75-80% of the variance in the bone strength (3). Based on this finding, measurement of BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is essential to assess bone strength and predict osteoporotic fractures. Advanced age and slender body habitus are risk factors for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures (4). This review focused on the effects on constitution, AVF and aging on total and regional BMD and soft tissue composition in women.

Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
DXA has been shown to be of diagnostic value in metabolic bone disease and made it possible to analyze bone mineral content, BMD, fat mass and lean mass (5-9). The coefficient of variation (CV) for DXA for total BMD and soft tissue mass was 0.5%-1.0% (5), whereas the CV for dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) with 153Gd for total BMD was 1.0%-2.0% (10). The mean BMD of the 2nd to 4th lumbar vertebrae (L2-4BMD), total body BMD, regional BMD, total and regional soft tissue mass were measured by DXA. As shown in Figure 1, the regional BMD (g/cm2) was measured in the head, arms, legs, ribs, thoracic spine, lumbar spine and pelvis. The lean mass (g) and the fat mass (g) of the head, arms, legs, and trunk were measured with a tissue bar.

Constitution
Constitution is one of the important determinants of bone mineral density. Obese women have greater BMD of the lumbar spine (11), distal end of the radius (12), hip, and cortical area of the metacarpal bones (13) than women of a normal weight. Our previous study showed that obesity was associated with high BMD of weight bearing-bones (lumbar spine, thoracic spine, pelvis, leg bones) (Table 1A) (7). The high body weight of obese women involves a high mechanical load being exerted on weight bearing bones, which leads to osteoblast-mediated bone formation and inhibits osteoclasts-mediated bone resorption.
Lean mass of the legs and total body of obese women was significantly higher than that of thin women (Table 1B) (7). Saville et al. (14) showed that isotonic running exercise caused hypertrophy of both muscles and bones, and that the relation of muscle weight to bone weight remained constant. These findings suggest that an adequate mechanical load facilitates the synthesis of contractile proteins of leg muscles and bone formation to maintain or increase muscle volume and BMD.
Osteocytes play an important role in responding to mechanical load by changing bone metabolism (15-17). The gap junction of the long processes of osteocytes plays a key role in the transmission of a mechanical load to induce osteoblast-mediated bone formation, inhibition of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, or a combination of the two (18). The higher mechanical load is one of the significant contributing factors for the higher BMD of weight bearing-bones observed in obese women. In addition, obesity appears to be instrumental in reducing postmenopausal bone loss (19).
Total and regional fat mass is significantly higher in obese women than in nonobese women (Table 1C) (7). In postmenopausal women, 25-30% of the total extragonadal aromatization of androstenedione to estrone takes place in the skeletal muscles, and 10-15% in adipose tissue (20). This peripheral aromatization appears to be facilitated in obese women compared with nonobese women (21). Therefore, obese women obtain a greater supply of circulating estrogen which contributes to their higher BMD in obese women compared with thin women.

Atraumatic vertebral fracture
Atraumatic vertebral fracture (AVF) is the most typical fracture in osteoporotic patients, whereas hip fractures appear to occur in the most severe osteoporotic patients. Interestingly, AVF in osteoporotic patients is not always symptomatic, whereas appendicular fractures are always accompanied with local pain. AVF is easily identified by history of illness, physical examination and on radiographs. As shown in Figure 2, a vertebral fracture resulting in vertebral deformity (wedge, biconcave, or compression) was defined as a reduction of the anterior, central or posterior height of a vertebral body. BMD accounts for approximately 75-80% of the variance in the bone strength (3). Therefore, measurement of BMD is essential to assess bone strength and predict osteoporotic fractures. Previous studies have shown that BMD of osteoporotic patients with atraumatic fractures was lower than that without atraumatic fractures (22-25). In addition, lean mass and fat mass are confirmed as important fact ors in determining BMD (26, 27). Fast bone losers have a lower fat mass than slow bone losers in early postmenopause (27). Therefore, the measurement of lean mass and fat mass should be performed to predict bone loss and osteoporotic fractures.
We clarified the characteristics of total body and regional BMD and soft tissue composition in patients with AVF (8). The number of atraumatic fractures of L1 was the greatest of all thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and that of Th12 was the second greatest (Figure 3). The most common site of atraumatic vertebral fracture was the vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar region. In this study, in the patients with AVF, the BMD of weight bearing bones, except for that of the legs, was significantly lower than that of the patients without AVF. In contrast, there is no significant difference in soft tissue composition between the patients with AVF and the patients without AVF (Table 2A-C). The pattern of bone loss in different regions varies, and the difference may be attributable to a site-specific cortical to trabecular bone ratio. The relative content of trabecular bone was reported to vary different parts of the skeleton : the content of trabecular bone of vertebrae was 66-90%, that of the intertrochanteric region of femur was 50%, that of the femoral neck was 25%, that of the distal radius was 25%, that of the mid-radius was 1%, and that of the femoral shaft was 5% (28). Bone metabolism of the trabecular bone is approximately eight-fold as metabolically active as that of cortical bone, because the surface of trabecular bone is larger than that of cortical bone (29). The low BMD of the pelvis and thoracolumbar vertebrae observed in patients with AVF may be due to inhibition of bone formation and/or acceleration of bone resorption.

Aging
Aging is associated with low mechanical stress on bone as a result of a decrease in physical activity, estrogen deficiency (4, 30), low production of vitamin D3 (31), low calcium absorption in the small intestines (32) and activation of tumor necrosis factor, interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 (33-35), all of which are risk factors for the development of osteoporosis. The BMD of the lumbar spine in women reaches its maximum between 20 and 30 years of age (36), and remains almost constant until the 40's. Thereafter, the BMD decreases rapidly with the onset of menopause, and thereafter continues to decline slowly with age (37, 38). Osteoclast-mediated bone resorption is prominently accelerated in the first five or ten years after menopause. Women lose approximately 50% of their peak trabecular bone and approximately 35% of their peak cortical bone over their lifetime (39).
We showed that the magnitude of the decrease in lumbar and thoracic BMD was high compared with other regional BMDs, and that total fat mass and total lean mass declined with age to their respective minimal level (40). The lumbar and thoracic spines are rich in trabecular bone (28), and this may explain why the decrease in BMD is more marked in the spine compared with other regions. As for soft tissue, Reid et al. (41) showed that total fat mass was the most consistent predictor of BMD, while in contrast, lean mass showed no correlation with BMD at any site. Soft tissue composition may become a predictor of BMD in lumbar and thoracic BMD.

REFERENCES
1.Anonymous : Consensus development conference:diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646-650, 1993.
2.Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, Kushida K, Miyamoto S, Soen S, Nishimura J, Oh-hashi Y, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Tanaka H, Igai T, Kishimoto H : Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis : year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331-337, 2001.
3.Smith CB, Smith DA : Relationship between age, mineral density and mechanical properties of human femoral compacta. Acta Orthop Scand47:496-502, 1976.
4.Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O'Dowd KJ :Epidemiology of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev 7:178-207, 1985.
5.Russell-Aulet M, Wang J, Thornton J, Pieson RN Jr :Comparison of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone and soft tissue measurements : dual energy X-rays versus Gadolinium 153. J Bone Miner Res 6:411-5, 1991.
6.Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J:Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 51:1106-1112, 1990.
7.Takata S, Ikata T, Yonezu H : Characteristics of bone mineral density and soft tissue composition of Japanese obese women -application of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry-. J Bone Miner Metab 17:206-210, 1999.
8.Takata S, Ikata T, Yonezu H : Characteristics of regional bone mineral density and soft tissue mass in patients with atraumatic vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 18:287-290, 2000.
9.Takata S, Yasui N : Disuse Osteoporosis. J Med Invest48:147-156, 2001.
10.Nuti R, Righi G, Martini G, Turchetti V, Lepore C, Caniggia A : Methods and clinical application of total body absorptiometry. J Nucl Med Allied Sci31:213-221, 1987.
11.Kin K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Okamoto S, Inoue T : Bone mineral density of the spine in normal Japanese subjects using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry :Effect of obesity and menopausal status. Calcif Tissue Int 49:101-106, 1991.
12.Dalen N, Hallberg D, Lamke B:Bone mass in obese subjects. Acta Med Scand 197:353-355, 1975.
13.Dawson-Hughes B, Shipp C, Sadowski L, Dallal G :Bone density of the radius, spine and hip in relation to percent ideal body weight in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 40:310-314, 1987.
14.Saville PD, Whyte MP : Muscle and bone hypertrophy. Clin Orthop 65:81-88, 1969.
15.Doty SB : Morphological evidence of gap junctions between bone cells. Calcif Tissue Int 33 :509-512, 1981.
16.Lanyon LE : Osteocytes, strain detection, bone modeling and bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 53 (suppl. 1):S102-S107, 1993.
17.Cowin SC, Moss-Salentijn L, Moss ML : Candidate for the mechanosensor system in bone. J Biomech Eng 113:191-197, 1991.
18.Palumbo C, Palazzini S, Marotti G : Morphological study of intercellular junctions during osteocytes differentiation. Bone 11:401-406, 1990.
19.Ribot F, Tremollieres JM, Pouilles M, Bonneu M, Germain F, Louvet JP : Obesity and postmenopausal bone loss : The influence of obesity on vertebral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women. Bone 8:327-331, 1987.
20.Longcope C, Pratt JH, Schneider SH, Fineberg SE : Aromatization of androgens by muscle and adipose tissue in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 46:146-152, 1978.
21.MacDonald PC, Edman CD, Hemsell DL, Porter JC, Siiteri PK : Effect of obesity on conversion of plasma androstenedione to estrone in postmenopausal women with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130:448-455, 1978.
22.Gotfredsen A, Nilas L, Podenphant J, Hadberg A, Christiansen C : Regional bone mineral in healthy and osteoporotic women : a cross-sectional study. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 49:739-749, 1989.
23.Mautalen C, Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Fromm G :Bone diminution of osteoporotic females at different skeletal sites. Calcif Tissue Int 46:217-221, 1990.
24.Takahashi M, Kushida K, Naitou K : The degree of osteoporosis in patients with vertebral fracture and patients with hip fracture : Relationship to incidence of vertebral fracture. J Bone Miner Metab 17:187-194, 1999.
25.Hamanaka Y, Yamamoto I, Takada M, Matsushita R, Ota T, Yuh I, Morita R : Comparison of bone mineral density at various skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 17:195-200, 1999.
26.Sandler RB : Muscle strength assessments and the prevention of osteoporosis. J Am Geriatr Soc 37:1192-1197,1991.
27.Riis BJ, Rodbroj P, Christiansen C : The role of serum concentrations of sex steroids and bone turnover in the development and occurrence of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 38:318-322, 1986.
28.Einhorn TA : Bone strength : The bottom line. Calcif Tissue Int 51:333-339, 1992.
29.Frost HM : Dynamics of bone remodeling. In :Frost HM (ed) Bone biodynamics. Little Brown, Boston, pp315-334, 1964.
30.Nilas L, Christiancen C : Bone mass and its relationship to age and the menopause. J Clin Endorinol Metab 65:697-702, 1987.
31.Francis RM, Peacock M, Storer JH, Davies AE, Brown WB, Nordin BE : Calcium malabsorption in the elderly:The effect of treatment with oral 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Eur J Clin Invest 13:391-396,1983.
32.Heaney RP, Recker RP, Stegman MR, Moy AJ :Calcium absorption in women : relationships to calcium intake, estrogen status, and age. J Bone Miner Res 4:469-475, 1989.
33.Bertolini DR, Nedwin GE, Bringman TS, Smith DD, Mundy GR : Stimulation of bone resorption and inhibition of bone formation in vitro by human tumor necrosis factor. Nature 319:516-518, 1986.
34.Gowen M, Wood DD, Ihrie EJ, McGuire MK, Russell RG : An interleukin-1-like factor stimulates bone resorption in vitro. Nature 306 : 378-380, 1983.
35.Lorenzo JA, Sousa SL, Alander C, Raisz LG, Dinarello CA : Comparison of the bone resorbing activity in the supernatants from phytohemaglutinin-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with that of cytokines through the use of an antiserum to interleukin 1. Endocrinology 121 : 1164-1170, 1987.
36.Teegarden D, Proulx WR, Martin BR, Zhao J, McCabe GP, Lyle RM, Peacock M, Slemenda C, Johnston CC, Weaver CM : Peak bone mass in young women. J Bone Miner Res 100:711-716, 1995.
37.Lindquist O, Bengtsson C, Hansson T, Jonsson R : Changes in bone mineral content of the axial skeleton in relation to aging and the menopause. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 43:333-338, 1983.
38.Newton-John HF, Morgan DB : The loss of bone with age, osteoporosis, and fractures. Clin Orthop 71:229-252, 1970.
39.Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton LJ:Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular skeleton with aging : Relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 67:328-335, 1981.
40.Takata S, Ikata T, Yonezu H, Yoshida N : Effects of aging on regional bone mineral density. Osteoporosis Int 7 (Suppl 2):S79, 1997.
41.Reid IR, Ames R, Evans MC, Sharpe S, Gamble G, France JT, Lim TM, Cundy TF : Determinants of total body and regional bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women-a key role for fat mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:45-51, 1992.

Received for publication December 10, 2001 ; accepted January 31, 2002.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shinjiro Takata, M.D., Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Tokushima School of Medicine, Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima770-8503, Japan and Fax:+81-88-633-0178.