Effects of constitution,
atraumatic vertebral fracture and aging on bone mineral density and soft tissue composition in women
Shinjiro Takata and Natsuo Yasui
|
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University
of Tokushima School of Medicine, Tokushima, Japan
Abstract: Constitution, atraumatic vertebral fracture and
aging affect bone mineral density (BMD) and soft tissue composition.
The high body weight of obese women involves a high mechanical
load being exerted on weight bearing bones compared with thin
women, which probably contributes to their higher BMD and
the lower incidence of fractures in obese women compared with
thin women. Atraumatic vertebral fracture (AVF) is a typical
osteoporotic fracture and its favorite site of AVF is the
vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar region. The BMD of weight
bearing bones is lower in patients with AVF than in patients
without AVF, whereas there is no significant difference in
soft tissue composition between the two. The regional and
total BMD decrease with advancing age. The magnitude of the
decrease in lumbar and thoracic BMD is high compared with
other regional BMD, and total fat mass and total lean mass
decline with age to their respective minimal level. The high
rate of decrease in lumbar and thoracic BMD appears to be
due to the high content of trabecular bone compared with other
regional bones. J. Med. Invest. 49:18-24, 2002
Keywords:bone mineral density, osteoporosis, constitution,
fracture, aging
INTRODUCTION
Osteoporosis is a disease characterized by low bone mass and
the microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue, with a
consequent increase in bone fragility and susceptibility to
fracture risk (1). In 2000, the Japanese Society for Bone
and Mineral Research revised diagnostic criteria for primary
osteoporosis. (2)
At present, large numbers of postmenopausal women in Japan
are at high risk for osteoporosis and its associated fractures,
which is an issue of clinical importance. Osteoporotic fractures
are one of significant complications and an increasing health
care burden in osteoporotic patients. Therefore, in the treatment
of osteoporosis, prevention of fractures is undoubtedly a
major goal. Smith showed that bone mineral density (BMD) accounted
for approximately 75-80% of the variance in the bone strength
(3). Based on this finding, measurement of BMD by dual energy
X-ray absorptiometry is essential to assess bone strength
and predict osteoporotic fractures. Advanced age and slender
body habitus are risk factors for osteoporosis and osteoporotic
fractures (4). This review focused on the effects on constitution,
AVF and aging on total and regional BMD and soft tissue composition
in women.
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
DXA has been shown to be of diagnostic value in metabolic
bone disease and made it possible to analyze bone mineral
content, BMD, fat mass and lean mass (5-9). The coefficient
of variation (CV) for DXA for total BMD and soft tissue mass
was 0.5%-1.0% (5), whereas the CV for dual photon absorptiometry
(DPA) with 153Gd for total BMD was 1.0%-2.0% (10). The mean
BMD of the 2nd to 4th lumbar vertebrae (L2-4BMD), total body
BMD, regional BMD, total and regional soft tissue mass were
measured by DXA. As shown in Figure 1, the regional BMD (g/cm2)
was measured in the head, arms, legs, ribs, thoracic spine,
lumbar spine and pelvis. The lean mass (g) and the fat mass
(g) of the head, arms, legs, and trunk were measured with
a tissue bar.
Constitution
Constitution is one of the important determinants of bone
mineral density. Obese women have greater BMD of the lumbar
spine (11), distal end of the radius (12), hip, and cortical
area of the metacarpal bones (13) than women of a normal weight.
Our previous study showed that obesity was associated with
high BMD of weight bearing-bones (lumbar spine, thoracic spine,
pelvis, leg bones) (Table 1A) (7). The high body weight of
obese women involves a high mechanical load being exerted
on weight bearing bones, which leads to osteoblast-mediated
bone formation and inhibits osteoclasts-mediated bone resorption.
Lean mass of the legs and total body of obese women was significantly
higher than that of thin women (Table 1B) (7). Saville et
al. (14) showed that isotonic running exercise caused hypertrophy
of both muscles and bones, and that the relation of muscle
weight to bone weight remained constant. These findings suggest
that an adequate mechanical load facilitates the synthesis
of contractile proteins of leg muscles and bone formation
to maintain or increase muscle volume and BMD.
Osteocytes play an important role in responding to mechanical
load by changing bone metabolism (15-17). The gap junction
of the long processes of osteocytes plays a key role in the
transmission of a mechanical load to induce osteoblast-mediated
bone formation, inhibition of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption,
or a combination of the two (18). The higher mechanical load
is one of the significant contributing factors for the higher
BMD of weight bearing-bones observed in obese women. In addition,
obesity appears to be instrumental in reducing postmenopausal
bone loss (19).
Total and regional fat mass is significantly higher in obese
women than in nonobese women (Table 1C) (7). In postmenopausal
women, 25-30% of the total extragonadal aromatization of androstenedione
to estrone takes place in the skeletal muscles, and 10-15%
in adipose tissue (20). This peripheral aromatization appears
to be facilitated in obese women compared with nonobese women
(21). Therefore, obese women obtain a greater supply of circulating
estrogen which contributes to their higher BMD in obese women
compared with thin women.
Atraumatic vertebral fracture
Atraumatic vertebral fracture (AVF) is the most typical fracture
in osteoporotic patients, whereas hip fractures appear to
occur in the most severe osteoporotic patients. Interestingly,
AVF in osteoporotic patients is not always symptomatic, whereas
appendicular fractures are always accompanied with local pain.
AVF is easily identified by history of illness, physical examination
and on radiographs. As shown in Figure 2, a vertebral fracture
resulting in vertebral deformity (wedge, biconcave, or compression)
was defined as a reduction of the anterior, central or posterior
height of a vertebral body. BMD accounts for approximately
75-80% of the variance in the bone strength (3). Therefore,
measurement of BMD is essential to assess bone strength and
predict osteoporotic fractures. Previous studies have shown
that BMD of osteoporotic patients with atraumatic fractures
was lower than that without atraumatic fractures (22-25).
In addition, lean mass and fat mass are confirmed as important
fact ors in determining BMD (26, 27). Fast bone losers have
a lower fat mass than slow bone losers in early postmenopause
(27). Therefore, the measurement of lean mass and fat mass
should be performed to predict bone loss and osteoporotic
fractures.
We clarified the characteristics of total body and regional
BMD and soft tissue composition in patients with AVF (8).
The number of atraumatic fractures of L1 was the greatest
of all thoracic and lumbar vertebrae, and that of Th12 was
the second greatest (Figure 3). The most common site of atraumatic
vertebral fracture was the vertebral bodies of the thoracolumbar
region. In this study, in the patients with AVF, the BMD of
weight bearing bones, except for that of the legs, was significantly
lower than that of the patients without AVF. In contrast,
there is no significant difference in soft tissue composition
between the patients with AVF and the patients without AVF
(Table 2A-C). The pattern of bone loss in different regions
varies, and the difference may be attributable to a site-specific
cortical to trabecular bone ratio. The relative content of
trabecular bone was reported to vary different parts of the
skeleton : the content of trabecular bone of vertebrae was
66-90%, that of the intertrochanteric region of femur was
50%, that of the femoral neck was 25%, that of the distal
radius was 25%, that of the mid-radius was 1%, and that of
the femoral shaft was 5% (28). Bone metabolism of the trabecular
bone is approximately eight-fold as metabolically active as
that of cortical bone, because the surface of trabecular bone
is larger than that of cortical bone (29). The low BMD of
the pelvis and thoracolumbar vertebrae observed in patients
with AVF may be due to inhibition of bone formation and/or
acceleration of bone resorption.
Aging
Aging is associated with low mechanical stress on bone as
a result of a decrease in physical activity, estrogen deficiency
(4, 30), low production of vitamin D3 (31), low calcium absorption
in the small intestines (32) and activation of tumor necrosis
factor, interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 (33-35), all of which
are risk factors for the development of osteoporosis. The
BMD of the lumbar spine in women reaches its maximum between
20 and 30 years of age (36), and remains almost constant until
the 40's. Thereafter, the BMD decreases rapidly with the onset
of menopause, and thereafter continues to decline slowly with
age (37, 38). Osteoclast-mediated bone resorption is prominently
accelerated in the first five or ten years after menopause.
Women lose approximately 50% of their peak trabecular bone
and approximately 35% of their peak cortical bone over their
lifetime (39).
We showed that the magnitude of the decrease in lumbar and
thoracic BMD was high compared with other regional BMDs, and
that total fat mass and total lean mass declined with age
to their respective minimal level (40). The lumbar and thoracic
spines are rich in trabecular bone (28), and this may explain
why the decrease in BMD is more marked in the spine compared
with other regions. As for soft tissue, Reid et al. (41) showed
that total fat mass was the most consistent predictor of BMD,
while in contrast, lean mass showed no correlation with BMD
at any site. Soft tissue composition may become a predictor
of BMD in lumbar and thoracic BMD.
REFERENCES
1.Anonymous : Consensus development conference:diagnosis,
prophylaxis and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646-650,
1993.
2.Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki
M, Kushida K, Miyamoto S, Soen S, Nishimura J, Oh-hashi Y,
Hosoi T, Gorai I, Tanaka H, Igai T, Kishimoto H : Diagnostic
criteria for primary osteoporosis : year 2000 revision. J
Bone Miner Metab 19:331-337, 2001.
3.Smith CB, Smith DA : Relationship between age, mineral density
and mechanical properties of human femoral compacta. Acta
Orthop Scand47:496-502, 1976.
4.Cummings SR, Kelsey JL, Nevitt MC, O'Dowd KJ :Epidemiology
of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Epidemiol Rev
7:178-207, 1985.
5.Russell-Aulet M, Wang J, Thornton J, Pieson RN Jr :Comparison
of dual-photon absorptiometry systems for total-body bone
and soft tissue measurements : dual energy X-rays versus Gadolinium
153. J Bone Miner Res 6:411-5, 1991.
6.Mazess RB, Barden HS, Bisek JP, Hanson J:Dual-energy X-ray
absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and
soft-tissue composition. Am J Clin Nutr 51:1106-1112, 1990.
7.Takata S, Ikata T, Yonezu H : Characteristics of bone mineral
density and soft tissue composition of Japanese obese women
-application of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry-. J Bone
Miner Metab 17:206-210, 1999.
8.Takata S, Ikata T, Yonezu H : Characteristics of regional
bone mineral density and soft tissue mass in patients with
atraumatic vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Metab 18:287-290,
2000.
9.Takata S, Yasui N : Disuse Osteoporosis. J Med Invest48:147-156,
2001.
10.Nuti R, Righi G, Martini G, Turchetti V, Lepore C, Caniggia
A : Methods and clinical application of total body absorptiometry.
J Nucl Med Allied Sci31:213-221, 1987.
11.Kin K, Kushida K, Yamazaki K, Okamoto S, Inoue T : Bone
mineral density of the spine in normal Japanese subjects using
dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry :Effect of obesity and menopausal
status. Calcif Tissue Int 49:101-106, 1991.
12.Dalen N, Hallberg D, Lamke B:Bone mass in obese subjects.
Acta Med Scand 197:353-355, 1975.
13.Dawson-Hughes B, Shipp C, Sadowski L, Dallal G :Bone density
of the radius, spine and hip in relation to percent ideal
body weight in postmenopausal women. Calcif Tissue Int 40:310-314,
1987.
14.Saville PD, Whyte MP : Muscle and bone hypertrophy. Clin
Orthop 65:81-88, 1969.
15.Doty SB : Morphological evidence of gap junctions between
bone cells. Calcif Tissue Int 33 :509-512, 1981.
16.Lanyon LE : Osteocytes, strain detection, bone modeling
and bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 53 (suppl. 1):S102-S107,
1993.
17.Cowin SC, Moss-Salentijn L, Moss ML : Candidate for the
mechanosensor system in bone. J Biomech Eng 113:191-197, 1991.
18.Palumbo C, Palazzini S, Marotti G : Morphological study
of intercellular junctions during osteocytes differentiation.
Bone 11:401-406, 1990.
19.Ribot F, Tremollieres JM, Pouilles M, Bonneu M, Germain
F, Louvet JP : Obesity and postmenopausal bone loss : The
influence of obesity on vertebral density and bone turnover
in postmenopausal women. Bone 8:327-331, 1987.
20.Longcope C, Pratt JH, Schneider SH, Fineberg SE : Aromatization
of androgens by muscle and adipose tissue in vivo. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 46:146-152, 1978.
21.MacDonald PC, Edman CD, Hemsell DL, Porter JC, Siiteri
PK : Effect of obesity on conversion of plasma androstenedione
to estrone in postmenopausal women with endometrial cancer.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 130:448-455, 1978.
22.Gotfredsen A, Nilas L, Podenphant J, Hadberg A, Christiansen
C : Regional bone mineral in healthy and osteoporotic women
: a cross-sectional study. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 49:739-749,
1989.
23.Mautalen C, Vega E, Ghiringhelli G, Fromm G :Bone diminution
of osteoporotic females at different skeletal sites. Calcif
Tissue Int 46:217-221, 1990.
24.Takahashi M, Kushida K, Naitou K : The degree of osteoporosis
in patients with vertebral fracture and patients with hip
fracture : Relationship to incidence of vertebral fracture.
J Bone Miner Metab 17:187-194, 1999.
25.Hamanaka Y, Yamamoto I, Takada M, Matsushita R, Ota T,
Yuh I, Morita R : Comparison of bone mineral density at various
skeletal sites with quantitative ultrasound parameters of
the calcaneus for assessment of vertebral fractures. J Bone
Miner Metab 17:195-200, 1999.
26.Sandler RB : Muscle strength assessments and the prevention
of osteoporosis. J Am Geriatr Soc 37:1192-1197,1991.
27.Riis BJ, Rodbroj P, Christiansen C : The role of serum
concentrations of sex steroids and bone turnover in the development
and occurrence of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue
Int 38:318-322, 1986.
28.Einhorn TA : Bone strength : The bottom line. Calcif Tissue
Int 51:333-339, 1992.
29.Frost HM : Dynamics of bone remodeling. In :Frost HM (ed)
Bone biodynamics. Little Brown, Boston, pp315-334, 1964.
30.Nilas L, Christiancen C : Bone mass and its relationship
to age and the menopause. J Clin Endorinol Metab 65:697-702,
1987.
31.Francis RM, Peacock M, Storer JH, Davies AE, Brown WB,
Nordin BE : Calcium malabsorption in the elderly:The effect
of treatment with oral 25-hydroxyvitamin D3. Eur J Clin Invest
13:391-396,1983.
32.Heaney RP, Recker RP, Stegman MR, Moy AJ :Calcium absorption
in women : relationships to calcium intake, estrogen status,
and age. J Bone Miner Res 4:469-475, 1989.
33.Bertolini DR, Nedwin GE, Bringman TS, Smith DD, Mundy GR
: Stimulation of bone resorption and inhibition of bone formation
in vitro by human tumor necrosis factor. Nature 319:516-518,
1986.
34.Gowen M, Wood DD, Ihrie EJ, McGuire MK, Russell RG : An
interleukin-1-like factor stimulates bone resorption in vitro.
Nature 306 : 378-380, 1983.
35.Lorenzo JA, Sousa SL, Alander C, Raisz LG, Dinarello CA
: Comparison of the bone resorbing activity in the supernatants
from phytohemaglutinin-stimulated human peripheral blood mononuclear
cells with that of cytokines through the use of an antiserum
to interleukin 1. Endocrinology 121 : 1164-1170, 1987.
36.Teegarden D, Proulx WR, Martin BR, Zhao J, McCabe GP, Lyle
RM, Peacock M, Slemenda C, Johnston CC, Weaver CM : Peak bone
mass in young women. J Bone Miner Res 100:711-716, 1995.
37.Lindquist O, Bengtsson C, Hansson T, Jonsson R : Changes
in bone mineral content of the axial skeleton in relation
to aging and the menopause. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 43:333-338,
1983.
38.Newton-John HF, Morgan DB : The loss of bone with age,
osteoporosis, and fractures. Clin Orthop 71:229-252, 1970.
39.Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton
LJ:Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular
skeleton with aging : Relationship to spinal osteoporosis.
J Clin Invest 67:328-335, 1981.
40.Takata S, Ikata T, Yonezu H, Yoshida N : Effects of aging
on regional bone mineral density. Osteoporosis Int 7 (Suppl
2):S79, 1997.
41.Reid IR, Ames R, Evans MC, Sharpe S, Gamble G, France JT,
Lim TM, Cundy TF : Determinants of total body and regional
bone mineral density in normal postmenopausal women-a key
role for fat mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 75:45-51, 1992.
Received for publication December 10, 2001 ; accepted January
31, 2002.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shinjiro Takata, M.D., Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The University of Tokushima School of Medicine, Kuramoto-cho, Tokushima770-8503, Japan and Fax:+81-88-633-0178.
|
| |